Privacy Policy

Last Updated: December 1, 2025

Fact Checked by: Alex Firdaus, Head of Media

At MyTradingReviews, every broker is evaluated using a structured and consistent framework. Our goal is to provide clear, unbiased analysis that helps traders compare brokers based on meaningful criteria, not marketing claims.

Table of Contents

1. Our 3-Step Data Collection Process

We believe one source of data is never enough. To ensure our broker reviews are accurate and reliable, we use a structured three-step approach.

A. Direct Platform Testing

Our team tests broker platforms where possible to evaluate real trading conditions.

We assess:

  • Order execution speed
  • Platform stability during volatility
  • Spread behavior in live market conditions
  • Deposit and withdrawal flow
  • Dashboard clarity and account transparency
    This helps us understand how the broker performs beyond marketing claims.
B. Regulatory & Policy Verification

We verify licensing directly through official regulator databases.

We review:

  • Regulatory authority and tier
  • Client fund segregation policies
  • Investor compensation schemes
  • Legal documentation and terms
    If regulatory claims cannot be verified, this significantly impacts the broker’s score.
C. Ongoing Monitoring

Broker conditions change. Fees are adjusted. Regulations evolve.

We continuously monitor:

  • Changes in trading costs
  • Policy updates
  • Platform modifications
  • User-reported issues
    Our goal is to reflect current conditions, not outdated information.
2. The Ranking Breakdown: How We Calculate the Score

We rate brokers across five core categories. These scores are weighted and combined to produce the Overall Broker Score (for example, 8.6).


1. Regulation & Safety

This is the most heavily weighted category.
We evaluate:

  • Strength of regulatory oversight
  • Fund segregation practices
  • Investor protection coverage
  • Corporate transparency
    A broker with strong tier-1 regulation scores significantly higher than lightly regulated entities.

2. Trading Costs
We calculate the real cost of trading.
This includes:

  • Average spreads
  • Commissions
  • Swap fees
  • Inactivity charges
  • Hidden or unclear fees
    Transparent and competitive pricing improves the score.

3. Platform & Execution
Execution quality directly affects trading performance. We assess:

  • Available platforms (MT4, MT5, cTrader, proprietary platforms)
  • Execution model transparency
  • Stability during high volatility
  • Tool availability and usability
    Reliable execution and platform clarity are critical factors.


4. Deposits & Withdrawals

Capital access matters. We review:

  • Payment methods
  • Processing times
  • Withdrawal consistency
  • Fee transparency
    Verified reports of delayed or problematic withdrawals significantly reduce the score.


5. Account Structure & Support

This covers overall user accessibility. We evaluate:

  • Account types and minimum deposits
  • Leverage flexibility
  • Support responsiveness
  • Clarity of account conditions
    Clear structures and responsive support contribute positively to the rating.
3. What the Score Means

Score Range

Verdict

What it means

9.0 – 10.0

Elite

Strong regulation, transparent pricing, reliable execution, and consistent withdrawal performance.

8.0 – 8.9

Great

Well regulated and competitive, with minor limitations in costs, features, or support.

6.0 – 7.9

Average

Acceptable option, but may have higher costs, limited features, or weaker regulatory coverage.

4.0 – 5.9

High Risk

Concerns related to transparency, execution reliability, or withdrawal processes.

0.0 – 3.9

Scam / Blacklisted

Serious regulatory concerns, verified withdrawal issues, or significant transparency problems.

4. Affiliate Disclosure & Independence

MyTradingReviews is part of FinMedia Group.

To keep the platform free, we operate using a transparent referral model. If you open an account through certain links, we may earn a commission. This does not increase your trading cost.

Affiliate partnerships do not influence rankings or review outcomes.

Editorial integrity comes first. A broker cannot pay to improve its score or ranking. If a broker’s conditions deteriorate or serious issues are identified, the rating will reflect that, regardless of commercial relationships.

Our priority is long term credibility and transparent information for traders.